Germany climate exposure

Frankfurt Climate Exposure: Humidity and Environmental Conditions for Industrial Products

Frankfurt is a Central European benchmark environment where moderate temperatures can still produce meaningful humidity, condensation and seasonal durability stress.

Climate exposure summary
CE-2Moderate Exposure
  • Seasonal humidity exposure
  • Condensation potential in cool periods
  • Thermal cycling relevance

Seasonal humidity is the primary stressor. Freeze-thaw is the secondary driver for reliability and field durability decisions.

CE classes describe overall environmental severity and are not equivalent to ISO corrosivity classes.

Dominant mechanismsSeasonal humidityCondensation potentialFreeze-thaw and thermal cycling
TemperateModerate humidityLow marine exposure
Frankfurt50.111, 8.682
Engineering Climate Fingerprint™

Frankfurt environmental load barcode.

A normalized 0-100 matrix showing which exposure mechanisms dominate the deployment environment. Scores describe environmental load intensity, not failure probability.

ECF patternPrimary: Thermal · Secondary: Humidity
Humidity52Moderate
Condensation49Moderate
Thermal54Moderate
Marine6Minimal
Pollution48Moderate
Freeze34Low
Humidity: Seasonal RH80 and winter humidityCondensation: Shoulder-season dew-point marginThermal: Seasonal temperature range and cyclesMarine: Europe/Mediterranean v2.3 chloride layer at Frankfurt: 0.96 mg/m2/day (S0)Pollution: MERRA-2 sulfate deposition background at Frankfurt: 4.6 mg/m2/dayFreeze: Winter frost and freeze-thaw relevance
Typical Applications

Equipment categories where this climate profile is relevant.

Industrial EquipmentOutdoor ElectronicsEV ChargingTelecom EquipmentPower ElectronicsTransport Electronics
Why this climate matters

Why Frankfurt climate matters

Frankfurt is not a severe tropical or marine location, but it is an important engineering reference because many European products are implicitly designed around similar temperate assumptions.

Moderate climates can still experience surprisingly high humidity exposure, especially in winter and shoulder seasons when drying potential is limited and temperature transitions can support condensation.

For product qualification, Frankfurt is useful as a baseline environment for comparing more severe sites such as Houston, Singapore or Mumbai.

Engineering metrics

Exposure metrics that matter before deployment.

Climetry-derived indicators summarize environmental severity. ISO-derived indicators estimate material-related atmospheric corrosivity for metals such as carbon steel, zinc, copper and aluminum.

Climate Exposure SummaryTemperate baseline

Useful reference for Central European qualification.

Corrosion RiskModerate

Lower marine influence, but seasonal wet exposure remains relevant.

Condensation RiskModerate

Driven by seasonal humidity and temperature transitions.

RH80 Hours3,520 h/year

CEY10 significant but not tropical moisture exposure.

RH90 Hours1,263 h/year

CEY10 high humidity occurs mainly in cooler periods.

Climate ClassificationTemperate

Seasonal climate with winter and shoulder-season stressors.

Monthly climate profile

Frankfurt thermodynamic exposure by month.

Monthly mean values of the core thermodynamic variables. Only the monthly means are shown, without a spread or range.

The source and period of these monthly means are not documented on this page yet; they are not presented as CEY10 output.

Relative humidity

74 % average of the monthly means

Winter humidity is high, but lower temperatures reduce moisture capacity.

Jan 82 %, Feb 78 %, Mar 73 %, Apr 68 %, May 67 %, Jun 68 %, Jul 67 %, Aug 68 %, Sep 73 %, Oct 79 %, Nov 84 %, Dec 85 %65 %76 %87 %JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecJan: 82 %Feb: 78 %Mar: 73 %Apr: 68 %May: 67 %Jun: 68 %Jul: 67 %Aug: 68 %Sep: 73 %Oct: 79 %Nov: 84 %Dec: 85 %
Monthly mean
Air temperature

11.9 C average of the monthly means

Strong seasonal thermal cycle drives qualification and freeze-thaw context.

Jan 2.0 C, Feb 3.5 C, Mar 7.8 C, Apr 12.2 C, May 16.5 C, Jun 19.8 C, Jul 21.8 C, Aug 21.2 C, Sep 17.0 C, Oct 11.5 C, Nov 6.2 C, Dec 3.0 C-0.4 C11.9 C24.2 CJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecJan: 2.0 CFeb: 3.5 CMar: 7.8 CApr: 12.2 CMay: 16.5 CJun: 19.8 CJul: 21.8 CAug: 21.2 CSep: 17.0 COct: 11.5 CNov: 6.2 CDec: 3.0 C
Monthly mean
Absolute humidity

8.2 g/m3 average of the monthly means

Absolute humidity peaks in summer despite lower relative humidity.

Jan 4.2 g/m3, Feb 4.6 g/m3, Mar 5.7 g/m3, Apr 7.2 g/m3, May 9.8 g/m3, Jun 12.0 g/m3, Jul 13.4 g/m3, Aug 13.0 g/m3, Sep 10.5 g/m3, Oct 7.6 g/m3, Nov 5.4 g/m3, Dec 4.4 g/m33.1 g/m38.8 g/m314.5 g/m3JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecJan: 4.2 g/m3Feb: 4.6 g/m3Mar: 5.7 g/m3Apr: 7.2 g/m3May: 9.8 g/m3Jun: 12.0 g/m3Jul: 13.4 g/m3Aug: 13.0 g/m3Sep: 10.5 g/m3Oct: 7.6 g/m3Nov: 5.4 g/m3Dec: 4.4 g/m3
Monthly mean
Dew point

6.8 C average of the monthly means

Dew point tracks seasonal moisture and condensation-prone shoulder seasons.

Jan -0.8 C, Feb 0.2 C, Mar 3.2 C, Apr 6.2 C, May 10.0 C, Jun 13.0 C, Jul 14.7 C, Aug 14.2 C, Sep 11.0 C, Oct 7.1 C, Nov 3.1 C, Dec 0.1 C-2.7 C6.9 C16.6 CJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecJan: -0.8 CFeb: 0.2 CMar: 3.2 CApr: 6.2 CMay: 10.0 CJun: 13.0 CJul: 14.7 CAug: 14.2 CSep: 11.0 COct: 7.1 CNov: 3.1 CDec: 0.1 C
Monthly mean
Hourly CEY engineering statistics

Frankfurt representative-year diagrams.

These figures are calculated from the local hourly Climetry Environmental Year and translate thermodynamic climate data into engineering-readable duration, cycle and moisture-risk views.

Frankfurt CEY10 temperature duration

CEY10 temperature duration

Frankfurt's 1 C temperature-duration histogram is calculated from the selected hourly CEY10 source months. It shows how long products experience each outdoor temperature band during the representative year.

Frankfurt CEY10 relative humidity duration

CEY10 relative humidity duration

The RH duration histogram translates relative humidity into annual exposure hours. It supports moisture-sensitive electronics, coating, connector and enclosure screening.

Frankfurt Temperature x RH occurrence

Temperature x RH occurrence

The joint duration heatmap shows which temperature and humidity combinations occur together. This is more useful for durability screening than separate annual averages.

Frankfurt Psychrometric moisture density

Psychrometric moisture density

The psychrometric density view connects dry-bulb temperature with absolute humidity and helps identify moisture-rich operating conditions and drying limitations.

Frankfurt P05 / P50 / P95 thermodynamic profile

P05 / P50 / P95 thermodynamic profile

The percentile profile summarizes the representative spread of temperature, dew point, relative humidity, absolute humidity and dew-point margin.

Frankfurt Representative moisture-risk week

Representative moisture-risk week

The selected high-risk week highlights periods with elevated humidity, absolute humidity and small dew-point spread. It is a screening view for condensation and moisture-ingress relevance.

Frankfurt Daily temperature cycle histogram

Daily temperature cycle histogram

Daily temperature-cycle statistics provide engineering input for thermomechanical reliability assessments, enclosure breathing and gasket stress screening.

Frankfurt Heating-design cold-week histogram

Heating-design cold-week histogram

The cold-week temperature histogram is useful for heating-load screening in temperate and cold climates. In tropical climates it confirms low heating-design relevance.

Definitions

Terms used on this page.

CE class

A Climetry Exposure Class is a location-based environmental severity class for durability screening.

CE classes summarize humidity, condensation potential, marine influence, pollution context and thermal exposure. They are not ISO 9223 corrosivity classes.

RH80 exposure

RH80 exposure is the number of hours where relative humidity is at least 80%.

It is useful for identifying persistent moisture exposure relevant to electronics, coatings, connectors, enclosures and atmospheric corrosion screening.

Condensation potential

Condensation potential indicates conditions where surface wetting risk is elevated.

It is derived from temperature, dew point and humidity context. It is a screening indicator, not a measurement on a specific product surface.

Atmospheric transport screening

Europe/Mediterranean v2.3 chloride, CAMS SO2, and sulfate context.

Frankfurt chloride is sampled from the monthly Europe/Mediterranean v2.3 coastal receptor-grid total chloride layer. ISO-9223-style screening uses CAMS background SO2 Pc/Pd; MERRA-2 sulfate is reported independently as regional context.

Chloride Mean / Range0.96 mg/m2/day

Monthly Europe/Mediterranean v2.3 receptor-grid values range from 0.51 to 2.03 mg/m2/day at Frankfurt; the 12-month mean reconstructs the annual v2.3 value.

Chloride Statusv2.3 monthly EU screening

Europe/Mediterranean v2.3 combines MERRA-2 constrained background, EBAS/EMEP wet-deposition calibration and an EFC/Bulk-calibrated coastal receptor-grid correction. Frankfurt is 333km inland and remains ISO S0 in every month.

Distance to Coast334 km

The inland location keeps marine chloride exposure very low in the current transport layer.

MERRA-2 Sulfate4.6 mg/m2/day

Annual wet+dry sulfate deposition background sampled from MERRA-2.

Sulfate RoleIndependent context

MERRA-2 sulfate remains regional context, not ISO Pd. Live screening uses CAMS background SO2 Pc/Pd; experimental transport remains research-only.

ISO Input ClassesT3 / S0 / modeled SO2 background

Approximate screening inputs: time of wetness, low chloride and CAMS-derived SO2 Pd. MERRA-2 sulfate remains separate context.

Carbon SteelScreening only

Seasonal wetness and CAMS background SO2 dominate over marine chloride at Frankfurt.

ZincScreening only

Uses CAMS background SO2 Pd; no certified ISO site classification is claimed.

CopperScreening only

Screening-level atmospheric corrosivity context, not product-specific lifetime prediction.

AluminumScreening only

Low chloride means aluminum risk is more sensitive to local wetness, dirt retention and site shielding.

Corrosion DriverWet hours

For Frankfurt, humidity and condensation remain more relevant than marine chloride deposition.

Monthly atmospheric transport profile

Frankfurt chloride and sulfate screening by month.

Monthly chloride values below use the v2.3 monthly extension: the validated annual receptor-grid field is distributed by local monthly marine-source seasonality. Sulfate values are sampled from MERRA-2 2020-2024 monthly wet+dry deposition background.

Chloride deposition

0.958 mg/m2/day average of the monthly means

Monthly v2.3 chloride remains below the ISO S1 threshold in every month. The winter peak is visible, but Frankfurt remains an inland S0 chloride environment; road-salt splash and local site effects are not represented.

Jan 2.028 mg/m2/day, Feb 1.176 mg/m2/day, Mar 1.162 mg/m2/day, Apr 1.240 mg/m2/day, May 0.690 mg/m2/day, Jun 0.531 mg/m2/day, Jul 0.536 mg/m2/day, Aug 0.513 mg/m2/day, Sep 0.676 mg/m2/day, Oct 1.118 mg/m2/day, Nov 0.794 mg/m2/day, Dec 1.027 mg/m2/day0.331 mg/m2/day1.270 mg/m2/day2.210 mg/m2/dayJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecJan: 2.028 mg/m2/dayFeb: 1.176 mg/m2/dayMar: 1.162 mg/m2/dayApr: 1.240 mg/m2/dayMay: 0.690 mg/m2/dayJun: 0.531 mg/m2/dayJul: 0.536 mg/m2/dayAug: 0.513 mg/m2/daySep: 0.676 mg/m2/dayOct: 1.118 mg/m2/dayNov: 0.794 mg/m2/dayDec: 1.027 mg/m2/day
Monthly mean
MERRA-2 sulfate deposition

4.624 mg/m2/day average of the monthly means

MERRA-2 sulfate background is moderate for Frankfurt and peaks in late spring and summer.

Jan 3.560 mg/m2/day, Feb 3.940 mg/m2/day, Mar 4.460 mg/m2/day, Apr 4.580 mg/m2/day, May 5.430 mg/m2/day, Jun 6.330 mg/m2/day, Jul 5.630 mg/m2/day, Aug 5.250 mg/m2/day, Sep 4.710 mg/m2/day, Oct 3.990 mg/m2/day, Nov 4.090 mg/m2/day, Dec 3.520 mg/m2/day3.183 mg/m2/day4.925 mg/m2/day6.667 mg/m2/dayJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecJan: 3.560 mg/m2/dayFeb: 3.940 mg/m2/dayMar: 4.460 mg/m2/dayApr: 4.580 mg/m2/dayMay: 5.430 mg/m2/dayJun: 6.330 mg/m2/dayJul: 5.630 mg/m2/dayAug: 5.250 mg/m2/daySep: 4.710 mg/m2/dayOct: 3.990 mg/m2/dayNov: 4.090 mg/m2/dayDec: 3.520 mg/m2/day
Monthly mean
Plastic ageing context

Frankfurt UV and ozone exposure for polymer screening.

Frankfurt has a clear seasonal polymer-ageing pattern: low winter UV, high summer UV and moderate ozone.

Mean UV Surface Dose41.8 kJ/m2/day

ERA5 2015-2024 monthly climatology sampled at the city grid cell.

Peak UV Month76.6 kJ/m2/day

Highest monthly mean daily UV dose in the representative climatology.

Mean Surface Ozone27.0 ppb

CAMS EAC4 surface ozone climatology for elastomer and rubber ageing context.

Plastic Ageing Index62 / 100

Partial Climetry v0.1 screening index from UV and ozone only; not a lifetime prediction.

Engineering interpretation

For Central European products, plastic ageing is mainly a spring-to-summer qualification topic. Seasonal UV and ozone should be considered together with thermal cycling and winter moisture exposure.

Monthly plastic ageing profile

Frankfurt UV and ozone exposure by month.

Monthly profiles show UV surface dose, surface ozone and a partial Plastic Ageing Exposure Index. Thermal oxidation, hydrolysis and moisture ageing will be refined with CEY thermodynamic channels.

UV surface dose

41.8 kJ/m2/day average of the monthly means

Mean daily UV surface dose by calendar month. Useful for photo-oxidation screening of plastics, coatings, cable jackets and exposed polymer housings.

Jan 10.2 kJ/m2/day, Feb 22.8 kJ/m2/day, Mar 36.5 kJ/m2/day, Apr 60.2 kJ/m2/day, May 68.9 kJ/m2/day, Jun 76.6 kJ/m2/day, Jul 72.9 kJ/m2/day, Aug 63.2 kJ/m2/day, Sep 46.1 kJ/m2/day, Oct 23.8 kJ/m2/day, Nov 13.1 kJ/m2/day, Dec 7.7 kJ/m2/day0.0 kJ/m2/day42.4 kJ/m2/day84.9 kJ/m2/dayJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecJan: 10.2 kJ/m2/dayFeb: 22.8 kJ/m2/dayMar: 36.5 kJ/m2/dayApr: 60.2 kJ/m2/dayMay: 68.9 kJ/m2/dayJun: 76.6 kJ/m2/dayJul: 72.9 kJ/m2/dayAug: 63.2 kJ/m2/daySep: 46.1 kJ/m2/dayOct: 23.8 kJ/m2/dayNov: 13.1 kJ/m2/dayDec: 7.7 kJ/m2/day
Monthly mean
Surface ozone

27.0 ppb average of the monthly means

Monthly surface ozone climatology. Relevant for ozone-sensitive elastomers, seals, rubber parts and strained polymer components.

Jan 19.1 ppb, Feb 21.5 ppb, Mar 25.9 ppb, Apr 31.4 ppb, May 33.9 ppb, Jun 34.9 ppb, Jul 34.4 ppb, Aug 34.3 ppb, Sep 28.3 ppb, Oct 22.6 ppb, Nov 19.7 ppb, Dec 17.8 ppb15.7 ppb26.4 ppb37.0 ppbJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecJan: 19.1 ppbFeb: 21.5 ppbMar: 25.9 ppbApr: 31.4 ppbMay: 33.9 ppbJun: 34.9 ppbJul: 34.4 ppbAug: 34.3 ppbSep: 28.3 ppbOct: 22.6 ppbNov: 19.7 ppbDec: 17.8 ppb
Monthly mean
Plastic ageing exposure

62 score average of the monthly means

Partial Climetry Plastic Ageing Exposure Index v0.1 from UV and ozone channels only. Thermal and moisture ageing channels will be added from CEY.

Jan 27 score, Feb 52 score, Mar 78 score, Apr 80 score, May 81 score, Jun 81 score, Jul 81 score, Aug 81 score, Sep 78 score, Oct 55 score, Nov 33 score, Dec 22 score15 score52 score88 scoreJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecJan: 27 scoreFeb: 52 scoreMar: 78 scoreApr: 80 scoreMay: 81 scoreJun: 81 scoreJul: 81 scoreAug: 81 scoreSep: 78 scoreOct: 55 scoreNov: 33 scoreDec: 22 score
Monthly mean
Environmental data confidence

What the station comparison shows, and what it does not.

Exposure hours (RH80/RH90) and the hourly CEY engineering figures (duration, histogram and percentile diagrams) on this page come from the CEY10 representative year: real months selected from ERA5-Land 2015-2024 at one 0.25° grid cell. The monthly profile charts state their own data basis above them.

The station comparison below is a separate 2025 pilot. It compares monthly values of ERA5, the global reanalysis rather than ERA5-Land, at the nearest grid point with Meteostat airport observations: 12 monthly values per station. It does not validate the representative year, its exposure hours, CE classes or corrosion screening.

For some coastal cities, including Dubai, Mumbai, Seattle and Singapore, the representative-year exposure hours lie outside the annual range observed at the airport station. Broader station comparisons of ERA5-Land and CEY10 are described on the scientific validation page.

Station comparison, 2025 pilot

Frankfurt: ERA5 2025 monthly values vs Frankfurt Airport (EDDF)

ERA5 (the global reanalysis, nearest grid point) monthly means for 2025 compared with Meteostat observations at Frankfurt Airport (EDDF): 12 monthly values per variable. Bias is ERA5 minus station.

Air temperatureRMSE 0.72 °C

Mean bias −0.69 °C

Dew pointRMSE 0.21 °C

Mean bias −0.01 °C

Relative humidityRMSE 2.83 %-points

Mean bias +2.57 %-points

This pilot concerns the ERA5 dataset in one calendar year. It does not validate the CEY10 representative year, exposure hours such as RH80/RH90, CE classes or corrosion screening shown on this page. Scientific validation
Report preview

Frankfurt exposure report structure.

The full report combines climate classification, corrosion screening, condensation exposure, RH80/RH90 hours, marine context, monthly profiles, and reliability implications.

Climate ClassificationTemperateClimate zone
Climetry Exposure Class (CE)CE-2Environmental severity
Corrosion ScreeningModerateISO-derived indicator
Condensation RiskModerateMoisture
RH80 Hours3,520 h/yearWet-hour proxy
RH90 Hours1,263 h/yearExtreme humidity

Reliability implications for Frankfurt

High humidity and condensation exposure may result in a severe Climetry Exposure Class even if atmospheric metal corrosivity remains moderate. CE classes indicate environmental severity and qualification relevance, not failure probability.

  • Use Frankfurt as a baseline comparison for Central European reliability expectations.
  • Condensation and seasonal storage conditions may be more relevant than extreme heat.
  • Freeze, temperature cycling, and winter humidity should be included for outdoor products.
Learn More

Engineering context behind the city exposure pages.

Interactive assessment

Understand your own environmental exposure.

Analyze any location worldwide and compare humidity, condensation and environmental severity.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

What does CE-2 mean for Frankfurt?

CE-2 is a Climetry Exposure Class. It describes overall environmental severity for durability screening and qualification support at this location.

Is this a corrosion prediction?

No. The page provides environmental exposure screening. Corrosion indicators are engineering screening outputs, not failure probability and not a product-specific lifetime prediction.

How reliable are the climate data?

Exposure hours and the hourly CEY engineering figures (duration, histogram and percentile diagrams) come from the CEY10 representative year: real months selected from ERA5-Land 2015-2024 at one 0.25° grid cell. A separate 2025 pilot compared ERA5 monthly values with airport observations (12 monthly values per station); it does not validate the representative year or its exposure hours. For some coastal cities the representative-year exposure hours lie outside the range observed at the airport. The monthly profile charts state their own data basis above them. Treat the values as screening values.

What is the difference between CE class and ISO corrosivity?

CE classes describe overall environmental severity. ISO 9223 corrosivity classes describe material-related atmospheric corrosivity categories. They are related but not equivalent.

Which climate data does this page use?

Temperature, dew point and pressure from ERA5-Land, assembled into the CEY10 representative year (2015-2024), are used to derive relative humidity, absolute humidity and exposure hours. Other layers name their own source and period where they are shown.

Privacy settings

Essential functions support sign-in and requested services. They are not controlled by the analytics choice.

We remember your choice on this browser for 180 days. You can change it here at any time. Disabling analytics after it has loaded reloads this page; save unfinished work first.

Read the privacy policy