United States climate exposure

San Francisco Climate Exposure: Marine Chloride and Cool-Humid Corrosion Context

San Francisco is a cool marine deployment environment where corrosion relevance is driven more by chloride and persistent humidity than by heat.

Climate exposure summary
CE-4Cool Marine Exposure
  • Coastal chloride in the ISO S1 band
  • Persistent humidity and fog context
  • Low thermal stress

Marine chloride is the primary stressor. Persistent humidity is the secondary driver for reliability and field durability decisions.

CE classes describe overall environmental severity and are not equivalent to ISO corrosivity classes.

Dominant mechanismsMarine chlorideCool-humid wetnessLow heat / low freeze
Cool Mediterranean MarineModerate to high humidityCoastal marine exposure
San Francisco37.775, -122.419
Engineering Climate Fingerprint™

San Francisco environmental load barcode.

A normalized 0-100 matrix showing which exposure mechanisms dominate the deployment environment. Scores describe environmental load intensity, not failure probability.

ECF patternPrimary: Marine · Secondary: Humidity
Humidity58Moderate
Condensation52Moderate
Thermal18Low
Marine72High
Pollution36Low
Freeze2Minimal
Humidity: Persistent marine humidity and fog contextCondensation: Marine-layer dew-point margin and cool wetnessThermal: Low heat stress and mild seasonal temperature rangeMarine: Score set from an earlier North America V2 sample (74.8 mg/m2/day); the current V2 value on this page is 26.9 mg/m2/day (S1). Score not yet recomputedPollution: MERRA-2 sulfate deposition background at San Francisco: 2.7 mg/m2/dayFreeze: Rare frost exposure
Typical Applications

Equipment categories where this climate profile is relevant.

Outdoor ElectronicsTelecom EquipmentEV ChargingCoastal InfrastructurePower ElectronicsTransport Electronics
Why this climate matters

Why San Francisco climate matters

San Francisco demonstrates that corrosion exposure can be relevant even where heat stress is relatively low.

Marine chloride, fog-prone humidity and limited drying potential can affect exposed metals, connectors, fasteners and enclosure interfaces.

For qualification planning, San Francisco is a useful contrast case to hot-humid cities such as Houston or Singapore because the dominant mechanism is coastal marine exposure rather than temperature.

What the data show

What sets San Francisco apart

  • Chloride rather than heat leads. The city-centre grid cell receives 26.9 mg/m2/day (ISO S1) at 2.2 km from the coast, close to three times Houston's 9.7 mg/m2/day, while monthly mean temperatures stay between 10.8 and 17.2 C.
  • High relative humidity, low moisture content. Monthly mean RH is 72-78 %, but absolute humidity stays between 7.1 and 11.1 g/m3. RH is high because the air is cool, so condensation relevance comes from surfaces cooling below a dew point of 6.7-12.0 C rather than from a tropical moisture load.
  • Fewer humid hours than the other coastal examples: 3,628 hours per year at or above 80 % RH, against 4,160 in Houston and 4,691 in Seattle.
  • The chloride value describes a city-centre cell. Seafront positions directly exposed to surf and spray can be higher; the layer does not resolve them.

Humidity hours (CEY10, 2015-2024), chloride deposition (modelled annual mean) and absolute humidity are different quantities. They are listed side by side, not combined into one scale. The station comparison for this city is still pending, see the validation section below.

Engineering metrics

Exposure metrics that matter before deployment.

Climetry-derived indicators summarize environmental severity. ISO-derived indicators estimate material-related atmospheric corrosivity for metals such as carbon steel, zinc, copper and aluminum.

Climate Exposure SummaryCool marine exposure

Low heat stress with coastal chloride and persistent humidity.

Corrosion RiskHigh

North America V2 chloride of 26.9 mg/m2/day at 2.2 km from the coast, combined with persistent humidity.

Condensation RiskModerate

Fog-prone and cool-humid periods can support surface wetness.

RH80 Hours3,628 h/year

CEY10 frequent high-humidity exposure without tropical heat.

RH90 Hours1,606 h/year

CEY10 extreme RH periods occur during fog and cool wet episodes.

Climate ClassificationCool Mediterranean Marine

Coastal, mild, low heat, strong marine modifier.

Monthly climate profile

San Francisco thermodynamic exposure by month.

Monthly mean values of the core thermodynamic variables. Only the monthly means are shown, without a spread or range.

The source and period of these monthly means are not documented on this page yet; they are not presented as CEY10 output.

Relative humidity

75 % average of the monthly means

Humidity is persistent despite mild temperatures, especially during fog-prone periods.

Jan 76 %, Feb 74 %, Mar 73 %, Apr 72 %, May 73 %, Jun 75 %, Jul 77 %, Aug 78 %, Sep 76 %, Oct 73 %, Nov 74 %, Dec 76 %71 %75 %79 %JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecJan: 76 %Feb: 74 %Mar: 73 %Apr: 72 %May: 73 %Jun: 75 %Jul: 77 %Aug: 78 %Sep: 76 %Oct: 73 %Nov: 74 %Dec: 76 %
Monthly mean
Air temperature

14.2 C average of the monthly means

Thermal stress is low; the climate is dominated by cool marine exposure rather than heat.

Jan 10.8 C, Feb 12.0 C, Mar 12.8 C, Apr 13.5 C, May 14.5 C, Jun 15.5 C, Jul 16.2 C, Aug 16.8 C, Sep 17.2 C, Oct 16.2 C, Nov 13.5 C, Dec 11.2 C10.0 C14.0 C18.0 CJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecJan: 10.8 CFeb: 12.0 CMar: 12.8 CApr: 13.5 CMay: 14.5 CJun: 15.5 CJul: 16.2 CAug: 16.8 CSep: 17.2 COct: 16.2 CNov: 13.5 CDec: 11.2 C
Monthly mean
Absolute humidity

9.1 g/m3 average of the monthly means

Absolute humidity is moderate but drying potential can remain limited near the coast.

Jan 7.1 g/m3, Feb 7.8 g/m3, Mar 8.2 g/m3, Apr 8.6 g/m3, May 9.3 g/m3, Jun 10.0 g/m3, Jul 10.6 g/m3, Aug 11.0 g/m3, Sep 11.1 g/m3, Oct 10.0 g/m3, Nov 8.4 g/m3, Dec 7.3 g/m36.6 g/m39.1 g/m311.6 g/m3JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecJan: 7.1 g/m3Feb: 7.8 g/m3Mar: 8.2 g/m3Apr: 8.6 g/m3May: 9.3 g/m3Jun: 10.0 g/m3Jul: 10.6 g/m3Aug: 11.0 g/m3Sep: 11.1 g/m3Oct: 10.0 g/m3Nov: 8.4 g/m3Dec: 7.3 g/m3
Monthly mean
Dew point

9.4 C average of the monthly means

Dew point and air temperature can remain close during fog and marine-layer conditions.

Jan 6.7 C, Feb 7.4 C, Mar 8.0 C, Apr 8.6 C, May 9.5 C, Jun 10.7 C, Jul 11.6 C, Aug 12.0 C, Sep 11.9 C, Oct 10.8 C, Nov 8.2 C, Dec 6.9 C6.1 C9.3 C12.6 CJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecJan: 6.7 CFeb: 7.4 CMar: 8.0 CApr: 8.6 CMay: 9.5 CJun: 10.7 CJul: 11.6 CAug: 12.0 CSep: 11.9 COct: 10.8 CNov: 8.2 CDec: 6.9 C
Monthly mean
Hourly CEY engineering statistics

San Francisco representative-year diagrams.

These figures are calculated from the local hourly Climetry Environmental Year and translate thermodynamic climate data into engineering-readable duration, cycle and moisture-risk views.

San Francisco CEY10 temperature duration

CEY10 temperature duration

San Francisco's 1 C temperature-duration histogram is calculated from the selected hourly CEY10 source months. It shows how long products experience each outdoor temperature band during the representative year.

San Francisco CEY10 relative humidity duration

CEY10 relative humidity duration

The RH duration histogram translates relative humidity into annual exposure hours. It supports moisture-sensitive electronics, coating, connector and enclosure screening.

San Francisco Temperature x RH occurrence

Temperature x RH occurrence

The joint duration heatmap shows which temperature and humidity combinations occur together. This is more useful for durability screening than separate annual averages.

San Francisco Psychrometric moisture density

Psychrometric moisture density

The psychrometric density view connects dry-bulb temperature with absolute humidity and helps identify moisture-rich operating conditions and drying limitations.

San Francisco P05 / P50 / P95 thermodynamic profile

P05 / P50 / P95 thermodynamic profile

The percentile profile summarizes the representative spread of temperature, dew point, relative humidity, absolute humidity and dew-point margin.

San Francisco Representative moisture-risk week

Representative moisture-risk week

The selected high-risk week highlights periods with elevated humidity, absolute humidity and small dew-point spread. It is a screening view for condensation and moisture-ingress relevance.

San Francisco Daily temperature cycle histogram

Daily temperature cycle histogram

Daily temperature-cycle statistics provide engineering input for thermomechanical reliability assessments, enclosure breathing and gasket stress screening.

San Francisco Heating-design cold-week histogram

Heating-design cold-week histogram

The cold-week temperature histogram is useful for heating-load screening in temperate and cold climates. In tropical climates it confirms low heating-design relevance.

Definitions

Terms used on this page.

CE class

A Climetry Exposure Class is a location-based environmental severity class for durability screening.

CE classes summarize humidity, condensation potential, marine influence, pollution context and thermal exposure. They are not ISO 9223 corrosivity classes.

RH80 exposure

RH80 exposure is the number of hours where relative humidity is at least 80%.

It is useful for identifying persistent moisture exposure relevant to electronics, coatings, connectors, enclosures and atmospheric corrosion screening.

Condensation potential

Condensation potential indicates conditions where surface wetting risk is elevated.

It is derived from temperature, dew point and humidity context. It is a screening indicator, not a measurement on a specific product surface.

Atmospheric transport screening

North America V2 chloride, CAMS SO2, and sulfate context.

San Francisco chloride is sampled from the current Climetry North America V2 land-only total chloride overlay. ISO-9223-style screening uses CAMS background SO2 Pc/Pd; MERRA-2 sulfate remains a separate regional context layer.

Annual Grid-Cell Chloride26.9 mg/m2/day

Annual mean sampled at San Francisco from the current North America V2 land-only total chloride overlay.

Chloride StatusV2 ISO screening

North America V2 combines NADP-calibrated marine wet deposition, dry-deposition uplift and a coastal aerosol tail. The sampled city-center grid cell is treated as broad marine aerosol exposure, not direct exposed surf/splash.

Distance to Coast2.2 km

Immediate marine exposure is the dominant atmospheric modifier.

MERRA-2 Sulfate2.7 mg/m2/day

Annual wet+dry sulfate deposition background sampled from MERRA-2.

Sulfate RoleIndependent context

MERRA-2 sulfate remains regional context, not ISO Pd. Live screening uses CAMS background SO2 Pc/Pd and does not resolve local plumes.

ISO Input ClassesT3 / S1 / modeled SO2 background

Approximate screening inputs: time of wetness, V2 total chloride and CAMS-derived SO2 Pd. MERRA-2 sulfate remains separate context.

Carbon SteelScreening only

Marine chloride is the main atmospheric modifier; final corrosivity depends on local wetness and shielding.

ZincScreening only

Uses V2 chloride and CAMS background SO2 Pd as engineering inputs, not certified ISO site measurements.

CopperScreening only

Screening-level atmospheric corrosivity context, not product-specific lifetime prediction.

AluminumScreening only

Chloride-sensitive interpretation should distinguish broad coastal aerosol exposure from local surf/splash siting.

Corrosion DriverMarine chloride

For San Francisco, marine chloride and cool-humid wetness dominate over heat and CAMS background SO2.

Monthly atmospheric transport profile

San Francisco chloride and sulfate screening by month.

Monthly chloride values are sampled from the current North America V2 total chloride overlay at the San Francisco grid cell. Sulfate values are sampled from MERRA-2 2020-2024 monthly wet+dry deposition background.

Chloride deposition

26.917 mg/m2/day average of the monthly means

Monthly V2 total chloride estimates stay in the S1 screening range at the sampled San Francisco city-center grid cell. Directly exposed open-coast pixels can be higher than the city-center sample.

Jan 27.200 mg/m2/day, Feb 28.100 mg/m2/day, Mar 27.400 mg/m2/day, Apr 27.500 mg/m2/day, May 27.100 mg/m2/day, Jun 26.700 mg/m2/day, Jul 26.200 mg/m2/day, Aug 26.100 mg/m2/day, Sep 26.300 mg/m2/day, Oct 26.600 mg/m2/day, Nov 26.800 mg/m2/day, Dec 27.000 mg/m2/day25.860 mg/m2/day27.100 mg/m2/day28.340 mg/m2/dayJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecJan: 27.200 mg/m2/dayFeb: 28.100 mg/m2/dayMar: 27.400 mg/m2/dayApr: 27.500 mg/m2/dayMay: 27.100 mg/m2/dayJun: 26.700 mg/m2/dayJul: 26.200 mg/m2/dayAug: 26.100 mg/m2/daySep: 26.300 mg/m2/dayOct: 26.600 mg/m2/dayNov: 26.800 mg/m2/dayDec: 27.000 mg/m2/day
Monthly mean
MERRA-2 sulfate deposition

2.711 mg/m2/day average of the monthly means

MERRA-2 sulfate background is low to moderate for San Francisco; marine chloride remains the dominant atmospheric modifier.

Jan 2.870 mg/m2/day, Feb 2.520 mg/m2/day, Mar 2.900 mg/m2/day, Apr 2.300 mg/m2/day, May 2.250 mg/m2/day, Jun 2.370 mg/m2/day, Jul 2.600 mg/m2/day, Aug 2.960 mg/m2/day, Sep 3.120 mg/m2/day, Oct 2.670 mg/m2/day, Nov 2.430 mg/m2/day, Dec 3.540 mg/m2/day2.095 mg/m2/day2.895 mg/m2/day3.695 mg/m2/dayJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecJan: 2.870 mg/m2/dayFeb: 2.520 mg/m2/dayMar: 2.900 mg/m2/dayApr: 2.300 mg/m2/dayMay: 2.250 mg/m2/dayJun: 2.370 mg/m2/dayJul: 2.600 mg/m2/dayAug: 2.960 mg/m2/daySep: 3.120 mg/m2/dayOct: 2.670 mg/m2/dayNov: 2.430 mg/m2/dayDec: 3.540 mg/m2/day
Monthly mean
Plastic ageing context

San Francisco UV and ozone exposure for polymer screening.

San Francisco combines strong summer UV with moderate ozone. The plastic-ageing signal is high even though thermal stress is low.

Mean UV Surface Dose67.2 kJ/m2/day

ERA5 2015-2024 monthly climatology sampled at the city grid cell.

Peak UV Month106.3 kJ/m2/day

Highest monthly mean daily UV dose in the representative climatology.

Mean Surface Ozone29.3 ppb

CAMS EAC4 surface ozone climatology for elastomer and rubber ageing context.

Plastic Ageing Index77 / 100

Partial Climetry v0.1 screening index from UV and ozone only; not a lifetime prediction.

Engineering interpretation

This is a useful reminder that polymer ageing and metal corrosion do not always follow the same climate ranking. Cool marine environments can still create significant UV and ozone exposure for exposed plastics.

Monthly plastic ageing profile

San Francisco UV and ozone exposure by month.

Monthly profiles show UV surface dose, surface ozone and a partial Plastic Ageing Exposure Index. Thermal oxidation, hydrolysis and moisture ageing will be refined with CEY thermodynamic channels.

UV surface dose

67.2 kJ/m2/day average of the monthly means

Mean daily UV surface dose by calendar month. Useful for photo-oxidation screening of plastics, coatings, cable jackets and exposed polymer housings.

Jan 29.3 kJ/m2/day, Feb 49.5 kJ/m2/day, Mar 60.0 kJ/m2/day, Apr 84.8 kJ/m2/day, May 93.4 kJ/m2/day, Jun 106.3 kJ/m2/day, Jul 100.0 kJ/m2/day, Aug 89.9 kJ/m2/day, Sep 76.6 kJ/m2/day, Oct 53.3 kJ/m2/day, Nov 37.0 kJ/m2/day, Dec 26.1 kJ/m2/day16.5 kJ/m2/day66.2 kJ/m2/day115.9 kJ/m2/dayJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecJan: 29.3 kJ/m2/dayFeb: 49.5 kJ/m2/dayMar: 60.0 kJ/m2/dayApr: 84.8 kJ/m2/dayMay: 93.4 kJ/m2/dayJun: 106.3 kJ/m2/dayJul: 100.0 kJ/m2/dayAug: 89.9 kJ/m2/daySep: 76.6 kJ/m2/dayOct: 53.3 kJ/m2/dayNov: 37.0 kJ/m2/dayDec: 26.1 kJ/m2/day
Monthly mean
Surface ozone

29.3 ppb average of the monthly means

Monthly surface ozone climatology. Relevant for ozone-sensitive elastomers, seals, rubber parts and strained polymer components.

Jan 18.9 ppb, Feb 24.2 ppb, Mar 30.7 ppb, Apr 36.4 ppb, May 38.4 ppb, Jun 35.8 ppb, Jul 32.6 ppb, Aug 33.3 ppb, Sep 33.3 ppb, Oct 26.0 ppb, Nov 22.1 ppb, Dec 20.2 ppb16.6 ppb28.6 ppb40.7 ppbJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecJan: 18.9 ppbFeb: 24.2 ppbMar: 30.7 ppbApr: 36.4 ppbMay: 38.4 ppbJun: 35.8 ppbJul: 32.6 ppbAug: 33.3 ppbSep: 33.3 ppbOct: 26.0 ppbNov: 22.1 ppbDec: 20.2 ppb
Monthly mean
Plastic ageing exposure

77 score average of the monthly means

Partial Climetry Plastic Ageing Exposure Index v0.1 from UV and ozone channels only. Thermal and moisture ageing channels will be added from CEY.

Jan 64 score, Feb 77 score, Mar 79 score, Apr 82 score, May 83 score, Jun 82 score, Jul 80 score, Aug 81 score, Sep 81 score, Oct 78 score, Nov 76 score, Dec 58 score55 score70 score86 scoreJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecJan: 64 scoreFeb: 77 scoreMar: 79 scoreApr: 82 scoreMay: 83 scoreJun: 82 scoreJul: 80 scoreAug: 81 scoreSep: 81 scoreOct: 78 scoreNov: 76 scoreDec: 58 score
Monthly mean
Environmental data confidence

What the station comparison shows, and what it does not.

Exposure hours (RH80/RH90) and the hourly CEY engineering figures (duration, histogram and percentile diagrams) on this page come from the CEY10 representative year: real months selected from ERA5-Land 2015-2024 at one 0.25° grid cell. The monthly profile charts state their own data basis above them.

The station comparison below is a separate 2025 pilot. It compares monthly values of ERA5, the global reanalysis rather than ERA5-Land, at the nearest grid point with Meteostat airport observations: 12 monthly values per station. It does not validate the representative year, its exposure hours, CE classes or corrosion screening.

For some coastal cities, including Dubai, Mumbai, Seattle and Singapore, the representative-year exposure hours lie outside the annual range observed at the airport station. Broader station comparisons of ERA5-Land and CEY10 are described on the scientific validation page.

Station comparison, 2025 pilot

San Francisco: ERA5 2025 monthly values vs San Francisco International Airport (KSFO)

No station comparison is available for San Francisco in the 2025 pilot, so no agreement figures are shown.

This pilot concerns the ERA5 dataset in one calendar year. It does not validate the CEY10 representative year, exposure hours such as RH80/RH90, CE classes or corrosion screening shown on this page. Scientific validation
Report preview

San Francisco exposure report structure.

The full report combines climate classification, corrosion screening, condensation exposure, RH80/RH90 hours, marine context, monthly profiles, and reliability implications.

Climate ClassificationCool Mediterranean MarineClimate zone
Climetry Exposure Class (CE)CE-4Environmental severity
Corrosion ScreeningHighISO-derived indicator
Condensation RiskModerateMoisture
RH80 Hours3,628 h/yearWet-hour proxy
RH90 Hours1,606 h/yearExtreme humidity

Reliability implications for San Francisco

High humidity and condensation exposure may result in a severe Climetry Exposure Class even if atmospheric metal corrosivity remains moderate. CE classes indicate environmental severity and qualification relevance, not failure probability.

  • Treat marine chloride and cool-humid wetness as the dominant durability context.
  • Review coating systems, fasteners, connector sealing and galvanic compatibility for coastal deployments.
  • Use San Francisco as a contrast to hot-humid sites: corrosion relevance can be high even when heat exposure is low.
Learn More

Engineering context behind the city exposure pages.

Interactive assessment

Understand your own environmental exposure.

Analyze any location worldwide and compare humidity, condensation and environmental severity.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

What does CE-4 mean for San Francisco?

CE-4 is a Climetry Exposure Class. It describes overall environmental severity for durability screening and qualification support at this location.

Is this a corrosion prediction?

No. The page provides environmental exposure screening. Corrosion indicators are engineering screening outputs, not failure probability and not a product-specific lifetime prediction.

How reliable are the climate data?

Exposure hours and the hourly CEY engineering figures (duration, histogram and percentile diagrams) come from the CEY10 representative year: real months selected from ERA5-Land 2015-2024 at one 0.25° grid cell. A separate 2025 pilot compared ERA5 monthly values with airport observations (12 monthly values per station); it does not validate the representative year or its exposure hours. For some coastal cities the representative-year exposure hours lie outside the range observed at the airport. The monthly profile charts state their own data basis above them. Treat the values as screening values.

What is the difference between CE class and ISO corrosivity?

CE classes describe overall environmental severity. ISO 9223 corrosivity classes describe material-related atmospheric corrosivity categories. They are related but not equivalent.

Which climate data does this page use?

Temperature, dew point and pressure from ERA5-Land, assembled into the CEY10 representative year (2015-2024), are used to derive relative humidity, absolute humidity and exposure hours. Other layers name their own source and period where they are shown.

Privacy settings

Essential functions support sign-in and requested services. They are not controlled by the analytics choice.

We remember your choice on this browser for 180 days. You can change it here at any time. Disabling analytics after it has loaded reloads this page; save unfinished work first.

Read the privacy policy